By Natalie U. Roy

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is planning major safety improvements along a section of Arlington Boulevard (Rt. 50), between Glebe Road (Rt. 120) and Fillmore Street. The Department recently held public listening sessions where members of the affected communities, including from Lyon Park and Ashton Heights, commented on these proposed significant changes.

Specifically, the project proposes a raised median to separate eastbound and westbound Arlington Boulevard traffic. This is an improvement that many residents in the community have been asking VDOT to consider for years. This highly trafficked portion of Route 50 does not have any safety barriers (median strip or jersey barrier) dividing fast moving east and west traffic. 

As a result of the proposed median, left turns will only be accommodated at the traffic signals at Irving Street and Fillmore Street. The project also proposes to add dedicated left turn lanes, on Arlington Boulevard, at the Irving Street intersection and extend existing left turn lanes, on Arlington Boulevard, at the Fillmore Street intersection. Additionally, the project proposes to extend the existing service roads on the south and north side of Arlington Boulevard to improve safety. This project may involve changes and/or breaks in limited access control.

At the design public hearing, residents asked questions and expressed concerns over bike lane safety, the access road extensions, the loss of trees on the pedestrian and bike path, cut through traffic into the neighborhoods, and the timing. Additional information can be found on the project webpage (www.vdot.virginia.gov/ArlingtonBlvd). For more information please email mark.vanzandt@vdot.virginia.gov.

The full presentation from VDOT can be viewed here. 

By Tabitha Ricketts

As Vice President of Neighborhood Conservation, I serve as Lyon Park’s representative to the Arlington Neighborhoods Advisory Committee—ArNAC, for short. ArNAC is a program through which the neighborhoods of Arlington can leverage Arlington County government funding for projects that benefit our community. 

These projects can be capital improvements—updates to streets, streetlights, sidewalks, and other pedestrian safety measures, for example. There is also an increasing number of beautification projects in the works, which can help to improve the appeal and usefulness of County-owned parks and add green space where concrete would otherwise prevail. You can learn more about neighborhood-driven projects by visiting www.arlingtonva.us/Government/Projects/Arlington-Neighborhoods-Program/Capital-Improvement-Projects or explore a broader range of County-funded projects at www.arlingtonva.us/Government/Projects/Project-Types. 

What does this mean for Lyon Park? We, the members of the community, get to decide! As you look around our neighborhood, what stands out to you as an area that could use improvement? The first step is to have an idea. From there, we can start working through the steps to turn an idea into a project proposal. 

When determining priority projects for Lyon Park, I’ll consider the following factors:

– Size, scope, and cost of the project—the effort required

– Level of impact—the number of neighbors benefitting

– Proposed champion—a neighbor ready to lead the charge and champion the project with me

– Neighbor support—sentiment of the neighbors directly impacted by the proposed project

– Additional funding sources

– Bonus for sidewalk or park project

Priority will go to projects that are lower in effort, positively impact the greatest number of neighbors, have a dedicated champion ready to work through the process, have general support from impacted neighbors, have additional funding sources to supplement County funding, and address sidewalks or County park locations. (Note that Lyon Park and our community center are owned by us, the neighborhood; that is not a County park.)

These criteria align closely with the ArNAC points system, in which points are awarded to neighborhood projects in the Committee’s queue (projects with the highest point value determine which projects are considered for approval first by ArNAC and then by the County). The ArNAC points system awards additional points for projects with supplemental funding sources and sidewalk or park projects, so our priority measurement takes that into account.

Are you ready to get started? Reach out to me via email at Tabitharicketts@gmail.com with your ideas, keeping in mind the factors listed above, and let’s turn our dreams into actions!. 

By Anne Bodine

The County Board in July advertised a proposed zoning code amendment (the gist of which is contained in the Board report for the county board meeting) to allow recovery homes in Arlington. The policy will be up for final approval in October. The proposed policy change includes several revisions to policy and code:

– re-definition of “recovery residences;”

– allowing recovery residences:

– by-right in single-family detached dwellings for up to 8 unrelated persons; and

– by special exception use permit approval for either more than 8 persons, or in a dwelling unit other than a detached single-family dwelling;

– modifying “residential use classification” to categorize recovery residences as an example of Household Living

The proposal was on tap for a final Board vote September 14, but Board Chair Garvey deferred action to an October 7 Planning Commission meeting with a final vote by the Board October 19.  If you have concerns about the new proposals, you need to weigh in with one or both of these groups. More background follows:

The first of the proposed changes aligns Arlington’s definition of “recovery residence” with that of Virginia (Code §37.2-461.1), namely

“a housing facility…certified by the Department [of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services or BHDS]…and provides alcohol-free and illicit-drug-free housing to individuals with substance abuse disorders and individuals with co-occurring mental illnesses and substance abuse disorders that does not include clinical treatment services.”

The second change increases the number of residents in single-family detached homes from four to eight (with no use permit), and increases the numbers in multifamily areas from four to “more than eight persons” through a use permit.

Background. In 2023, Oxford House, Inc. which operates nationally asked the county to allow it to “operate” recovery residences in single-family detached homes and cited persons in drug and/or alcohol recovery as “handicapped individuals” per the 1988 amendments to the Federal Fair Housing Act. Oxford requested that the recovery residence receive equal treatment to single-family dwellings under the zoning regulations.

Currently, Arlington zoning code is silent on the issue of recovery residences, which means they are not “explicitly permitted.”  County staff notes the “closest cognate is group homes for persons with developmental disabilities.”  Staff also reported that recovery homes are not required to follow regulations the same regulations that apply to group homes for those with developmental disabilities, including:

licensing by State Authorities (instead recovery residences are “certified” by VA BHDS as complying with the standards in Code of Virginia §37.2-431.1 but there are no penalties because the facilities are self-regulating);

Operation via a non-profit or government organizations (instead they operate independently);

Onsite resident care or services.

Current zoning allows up to 4 unrelated adults to live in a home together; it also allows 8 unrelated individuals with developmental or intellectual disabilities to occupy one home, including detached single-family homes. Arlington also requires that such homes be licensed by the State which means recovery homes have not been permitted. (Note:  The Virginia House of Delegates will carry over House Bill 646 from the 2024 legislative session that would require jurisdictions to govern recovery homes by the same standard, notwithstanding this State Licensing provision. If this were to be enacted next year, Arlington would have to allow the recovery homes in the same manner as it currently is proposing with this zoning amendment in October.

While not mentioned in the Board report, Arlington apparently already has eight recovery residences, some in single-family homes, some run by Oxford Houses, all of which are apparently illegal since our zoning code does not recognize this as a legal use of property yet. Only four of them are currently “certified” as required by the state. At a minimum this is very complex as it intertwines federal, state, and local law. It’s worth noting there has been documented fraud with recovery homes in other states, and some states are trying to better regulate such homes, which are also often owned by investors unrelated to Oxford House or other recovery home “managers.”  If you would like more information, please contact me at annebodine@yahoo.com. I recommend you also read and watch the Board report and the resources listed below:

Staff presentation to county board July 22, 2024

Planning Commission Meeting September 4, 2024.